‘The Odyssey’ – Film Review and Analysis

“This film is one of those rare ones where three hours flies by, there are no major weaknesses besides some small sound mixing difficulties, and the last third act of it may be the best of the 2020s decade so far.”

It is very rare where I must see a movie in theaters twice. That was exactly the case though for this summer’s blockbuster hit and clear Academy Awards contender, ‘The Odyssey’ (2026), directed by Christopher Nolan, which is a stunning film revival of the 3000-year epic. While it’s been a long time since I read Homer’s epic in high school, ‘The Odyssey’, the basic premise of Nolan’s film adaptation has stayed largely the same with some changes and subtractions needed to preserve a three-hour screen time.

This film deserves to be seen in theaters, at least once, preferably in the order of 1.) IMAX 70mm, 2.) IMAX regular, 3.) 70mm, depending on what is available in your local movie theater. This film is one of those rare ones where three hours flies by, there are no major weaknesses besides some small sound mixing difficulties, and the last third act of it may be the best of the 2020s decade so far.

Why am I so ebullient about ‘The Odyssey’? There are a lot of positives about this film but the biggest one for me was just how beautifully shot this film is, how the locations seem otherworldly and seem to come straight out of the pages of Homer’s epic poem, and how your mouth drops at certain points of the film wondering just how Nolan pulled filming these scenes off? I know there are no real spoilers for a 3000-year-old epic, but consider the Cyclops scene, the Hades scene, and the Troy scenes, for which all of them will go down in cinematic history as some of the best of all-time.

It’s not just the big battles that are done well in terms of clear direction and cinematography; there are the small moments in the film where you see Odysseus looking out at a pack of dolphins swimming in the sea by his ship, panoramic and sweeping views shot of Ithaca (Odysseus’s kingdom), and the various islands and islets that make up the ill-fated journey home but never really become that repetitive in terms of their setting.

More than how visually stunning ‘The Odyssey’ is as a film but also how complete of a movie it is when you focus on the beautiful music score of Ludwig Gorannson, one of the best composers in film today, if not the best, currently working in film music. It is a haunting score tied deeply into each unique scene, and for which never feels out of place or is too overbearing. Especially seeing it in IMAX, the score and sounds are immersive, so every Cyclops yell, clash of swords, and soldiers’ war cry feel amplified like you’re also there in Ancient Greece. Now, I understand there are complaints about the casting, costume design, authenticity of the period, but that never affected my judgment of the movie rarely, if at all. You could argue about the authenticity of this adaptation but the creativity, the direction, the acting, the scenery, and the overall messages and themes of the film are all phenomenal and speak to why this is the best film of 2026 so far.

Matt Damon as ‘Odysseus’ was honestly much better than I had expected going into my viewing, and he is able to carry the sheer physicality and mental toll of playing this character. He looks convincing as a wily, cunning, aging, and most assuredly stubborn King of Ithaca whose hubris leads his men astray for more than ten years after the victory at Troy. Damon really puts his heart and soul into this role, and you can tell how dedicated he was to show how Odysseus’s fateful decisions at Troy affected how he viewed his decades-long journey home after that fateful night of what became a ‘hunt’ and not a ‘fight’ after pulling off the Trojan horse gambit at the film’s beginning. His anguish, regret, pain, sorrow, and other emotions boil to the surface of his ‘Odysseus’ character without feeling forced or out of place throughout the film, especially in its conclusion when he delivers an impactful monologue upon seeing his beloved ‘Penelope’ again.        

Anne Hathaway deserves equal praise for her portrayal of ‘Penelope’, Odysseus’s wife, who provides the emotional counterweight to Damon’s Odysseus. While Odysseus spends the film fighting, wandering, scheming, and trying to find his way home to Ithaca after the Trojan War, Penelope is forced to endure the much quieter but arguably just as difficult burden of waiting, especially since she can’t usurp the throne in the meantime as a woman. Hathaway does a wonderful job portraying a woman who is resilient without becoming emotionally hardened, and hopeful without being naïve about where Odysseus is.

The importance of Ithaca throughout the film is largely embodied through Penelope’s dilemma of moving on with her life. It is not simply the physical destination that Odysseus is desperately trying to reach; it is his family, his identity, and the life that existed before the Trojan War transformed him. In that sense, Hathaway makes Penelope an essential part of the film’s larger meditation on what it means to come home.   

Samantha Morton as the sorceress ‘Circe’ deserves considerable credit for making the human consequences of the Trojan War impossible to ignore. Troy is presented as a spectacular military achievement, but Nolan is far more interested in showing that victory does not necessarily mean anyone has truly won. The Greeks may have conquered Troy, but the war has left behind an enormous amount of suffering, grief, trauma, and resentment for which Circe is keenly aware of when she encounters some of Odysseus’s men in the aftermath.

Morton’s heart wrenching performance as ‘Circe’ helps demonstrate that the people who pay the greatest price for the ambitions of kings and warriors are often the people who had the least say in starting the conflict in the first place. The Trojan War may be the film’s great military triumph, but it is also the beginning of Odysseus’s tragedy. The victory at Troy is not the end, but rather the beginning of consequences that ripple outward through the epic, affecting every character, human and otherworldly alike, in a world defined by a “time of apparent magic” and humanity’s defiance of the gods.

Robert Pattinson deserves considerable praise for his portrayal of ‘Antinous’, one of the film’s most despicable characters. Pattinson leans into Antinous’s arrogance, cowardice, and entitlement without turning him into a stereotypical cartoon villain. He represents something fundamentally different from the external dangers Odysseus faces throughout his journey: the corruption that can develop inside a supposedly civilized society when the institution erodes without true leadership. Antinous has power, status, and access to Ithaca’s royal household, yet he uses those advantages to intimidate and exploit rather than protect, as he had promised Odysseus when he left for the Trojan War that he would look after Telemachus, Odysseus’s son.                

His behavior toward Penelope, Telemachus, and the other suitors makes him particularly effective as a symbol of what happens when Zeus’s hospitality is abused. Guests are supposed to respect the household that welcomes them, but Antinous and the suitors increasingly act as though Odysseus’s and Penelope’s home belongs to them. Pattinson makes that arrogance believable, and his performance becomes vital to the film’s eventual final reckoning in Ithaca. The biggest danger facing Odysseus is ultimately not just the monsters and gods he encounters abroad; it is also the possibility that the civilization he has fought so hard to return to has been hollowed out from within, largely thanks to Antinous and his ilk.

John Leguizamo’s performance as Eumaeus provides almost the perfect counterpoint and is the film’s #1-character standout in my view. Where Antinous represents entitlement, Eumaeus represents loyalty, humility, and genuine hospitality. He is not a king, warrior, or powerful political figure in Ithaca, yet his humanity makes him one of the most important supporting characters in the epic.

Eumaeus demonstrates that civilization is not ultimately sustained by the people with the most power but by ordinary people who continue to treat others with dignity even when they have little to gain from doing so. His relationship with Odysseus also gives the homecoming storyline some of its emotional warmth. After everything Odysseus has endured, Eumaeus represents a version of Ithaca that is still worth returning to decades later: a place where loyalty and decency have survived despite the chaos surrounding it. Leguizamo brings a grounded humanity to the role that helps keep the film from becoming consumed entirely by its larger-than-life spectacle.

The major theme of moral reckoning becomes especially important when considering the film’s depiction of Troy and the broader world surrounding Odysseus. One of the more intriguing aspects of The Odyssey is its multiple references to the so-called ‘Sea Peoples’ and a Mediterranean world that increasingly feels as though it is coming apart at the seams. Historically, the Bronze Age collapse was an enormously complicated event with multiple possible causes, and it would be overly simplistic to suggest that the ‘Sea Peoples’ alone brought down the civilizations of the eastern Mediterranean.

However, as a cinematic device used by Nolan, the reference made to them is enormously effective when you watch the film. Nolan presents a world in which established civilizations are becoming increasingly unstable, populations are moving, kingdoms are fighting for survival, and the institutions that once connected different peoples for trade and cooperation are beginning to disappear because of the loss of ‘xenia’ or hospitality.

The seamless weaving of a powerful central theme is where The Odyssey becomes much more than an adventure epic. One of the most important concepts in Homer’s original epic is xenia, the ancient Greek tradition of hospitality toward strangers and guests. Throughout Odysseus’s journey, hospitality is treated almost as a moral law. How a person treats a stranger reveal something fundamental about that person’s character and the society in which they live. Some people welcome Odysseus and his men in the film. Others exploit them, imprison them, attack them, or treat them as something less than human. The consequences of Odysseus’s choices are often enormous, and it all started with his idea of the Trojan horse, leading to the invasion, capture, and the fall of Troy that led to the loss of Zeus’s hospitality being universally practiced.

Nolan’s film adaptation of the epic makes this ancient idea surprisingly relevant to our world today. Civilizations are not held together solely by armies, walls, ships, or kings. They depend upon trust, reciprocity, restraint, and the belief that people outside our immediate community still possess humanity and dignity. Once those principles disappear, every stranger becomes a potential enemy, every neighbor becomes a potential threat, and every disagreement becomes a reason for violence. The result is a world increasingly incapable of cooperating with itself.

That makes the Bronze Age setting of The Odyssey epic feel almost eerily contemporary without the movie ever needing to become explicitly political. The civilizations surrounding Odysseus are not destroyed simply because they lack powerful warriors. They are part of a world in which conflict, displacement, revenge, greed, and mistrust have become increasingly difficult to contain or avoid. The film suggests that civilization is more fragile than we like to believe. It can take generations to build a functioning society and remarkably little time to begin tearing it all apart.

Perhaps that is why the film’s emphasis on homecoming ultimately carries so much weight for everyone who has watched it in theaters. Odysseus is not simply trying to survive long enough to reach Ithaca and his family. He is trying to return to a world that existed before the war and before his own mistakes changed that world forever. The journey home forces him to confront the difference between being a great warrior and being a good king, between being clever and being wise, and between winning a war and understanding what that fateful victory cost you.

Ultimately, that is what makes The Odyssey such a compelling film in 2026. Beneath all the spectacular battles, enormous sets, incredible locations, visual effects, and booming IMAX sound is a remarkably old story about very familiar problems for humanity: pride, love, grief, revenge, loyalty, temptation, family, and the desire to return home after being changed by the world. Christopher Nolan has taken a story that is roughly three thousand years old and somehow made it feel alive and vibrant again, which is no small achievement at all.   

That may be the most lasting achievement of Nolan’s The Odyssey as an adaptation. It takes an ancient story about one man trying desperately to get home and turns it into something much larger: a story about what happens when humanity loses its way, and what it takes to find its way home again. For me, that makes The Odyssey the best film of 2026 so far, and one of the rare Hollywood blockbusters that feels worthy of the word epic. I went to see it the first time in IMAX. Then I went back and saw it again in 70mm recently because it was that good. I suspect that says just about everything about how special this film is and why you should see it yourself.

Knicks vs. Wizards at Capital One Arena (December 2024)

“My annual visit to see my favorite NBA team, the New York Knicks go up against the Washington Wizards in Washington, DC at Capital One Arena with this particular game occurring in late December 2024.”

Camera: iPhone 15

Locations: Capital One Arena; Washington, District of Columbia, United States

Memories Are The Only Form of Immortality For Our Loved Ones

“Instead, we should be more focused on the only form of immortality that should matter, which is living on in the memories and thoughts of our loved ones for as long as possible.”

When we think about immortality, we should not think about it in the literal sense that anybody on Earth is ever going to live forever no matter how many scientific advances are made in the future. While people continue to research and work on expanding their given lifespan to eventually never find themselves at death’s door, life is meant to be finite, and that’s the case no matter how long we are given to live that one life. Instead, we should be more focused on the only form of immortality that should matter, which is living on in the memories and thoughts of our loved ones for as long as possible.

No matter who you are in the world, everyone has lost a loved one in their life at some point, whether it was a family member, a friend, or an acquaintance and the grieving process is different for everybody. What anyone who has had that special connection with someone else wouldn’t give to have had another talk, another meal, another time with that loved one is truly priceless but for which we can never get back when they’re gone. Because we don’t ever get that time back with our loved one regardless of who they are or what they did during their life, we should focus instead on remembering the good times and memories that were shared together.

It’s key to really jot those memories down, reflect on them, keep items or trinkets that remind you of your lost loved ones, and think also about the places where they lived or visited. No one is ever truly gone if you carry them with you throughout your life and teach your offspring or other family members about who that beloved person was and what they personally meant to you. While immortality in the abstract sense of a person living forever is not possible and will likely never come to pass, focus instead of making your loved one(s) immortal by thinking about them, preserving your photos and videos of them, telling people about them when appropriate, and keeping them in your heart and in your mind.

Hopefully, the memories you had together were mainly positive and the times you shared were both happy and joyful. Also, you shouldn’t try to make someone immortal in your thoughts and memories who wronged you or made you feel bad even if it was a family member or a friend. Relationships, even amongst family and friends, can be extremely complicated so your willingness to have someone become ‘immortal’ in the metaphorical sense, who was in your life but is now gone should be completely voluntary.

Perhaps that is the closest thing we must experiencing true immortality. We cannot stop death, we are also not supposed to stop death when we consider the religious and societal implications of that futile effort, and we cannot know whether any of us will ever exist again in another form. However, we should remember if we loved or cared for that person who is now gone from our lives physically.

We can still tell stories and tales about them. We can look at saved photographs years later and still smile at the person staring back at us, regardless of how young or old they were when the photos were taken. We can visit the places they once loved and think about the times that were shared with them there. If possible, we can also tell the next generation who they were, what they accomplished, what made them laugh, and why they mattered so much to you.

Eventually, even our own lives will become memories for someone else and hopefully several people in your family and friend group will remember you long after you’re gone because of how important an impact you made in their lives when you were there. That is both beautiful and sobering to think about when we think about the topic of death. We are temporary stewards on this Earth, but the effect that we can have on other people can outlive us for years or even decades later. In that sense, perhaps the best form of immortality is not living forever ourselves but leaving enough of ourselves behind so that others will remember us long after we are gone.

Zoo Lights at the National Zoo

“Enjoying the festive sights and sounds of the Zoo Lights festival at. the National Zoo in Washington, DC in December of 2024.”

Camera: iPhone 15

Locations: The National Zoo; Washington, District of Columbia, United States

If They Don’t Provide You with Peace, Don’t Indulge Them Further

“You must protect your time as much as possible, including who you decide to give it to or with whom you spend it. Time is a finite resource and it’s important to be a bit selfish with regards to who you give that time to.”

You must protect your time as much as possible, including who you decide to give it to or with whom you spend it. Time is a finite resource and it’s important to be a bit selfish with regards to who you give that time to. You have to be decisive in this part of life, especially as you get older. While it’s important to spend time with family, friends, or acquaintances outside of work or business, you should also be intentional about who receives your time and energy.

Life is hard enough as it is on its own without other people adding to your stress. Some friction is inevitable in any friendship or relationship and it’s important to work through it as responsible adults. However, the difference in when knowing not to indulge them further or cut ties with them is if every interaction or meetup leaves you feeling emotionally taxed or if they didn’t bring any positive impact to you all getting together. This is especially important when you’re thinking about being friends or a romantic partner with someone long-term. You want to leave them feeling better than you did when you first saw them or began seeing each other. If every interaction with them consistently leaves you emotionally drained, frustrated, or questioning why you continue giving this person your time, that’s worth paying attention to and trusting your instincts about whether to keep seeing them or not.

You don’t want to use that person as an emotional punching bag either to vent or to complain but you should be able to express yourself freely without judgment or needing to mask your emotions. We each do that enough during the day with strangers, with work colleagues, or in general. You should be able to be vulnerable and true to heart with someone who can provide you peace by listening to you, giving you real feedback and advice, or just being there when you’re going through both good times and bad times.

Peace, however, doesn’t necessarily mean convenience. Someone can provide you with peace because they are agreeable and never challenge you, but that doesn’t necessarily make them a good friend or romantic partner. A healthy relationship isn’t one where you always agree or never frustrate one another. In fact, someone can occasionally frustrate you, challenge your thinking, or even disagree with you and still be an incredibly valuable person in your life. The difference is how you handle those disagreements and how you feel about the relationship’s progression overall.

It may be worth asking yourself three simple questions when thinking about keeping the relationship going or letting it end on a good note: Can I be myself around this person? Can we disagree without disrespecting one another? And after spending time with them consistently, do I generally feel better or worse? Your answers to those questions can tell you a great deal about whether a friendship or a relationship provides genuine peace or simply avoiding conflict.

If you find that you’re not really getting along well with them consistently, maybe either or both of you have changed since you first got together, it may be useful to evaluate whether it’s worth moving forward with them in the future. Friendships and relationships often have a beginning and an end due to several factors and it’s important to end things honestly and on a good note, if possible. Just because they don’t provide you with peace or comfort anymore doesn’t mean there have to be bitter feelings at the end of it for both parties.

The main thing to keep in mind is that each time you get together, you can be open and honest with them while not being combative, dismissive, or confrontational for no discernible reason. Peace and harmony in any relationship or friendship is absolutely the minimum you should strive for and when it’s constantly not like that regardless of the frequency of getting together, you may need to either limit the interactions with that person or cut them off entirely.

There’s an oft-used statement that’s used for adults in that you must be willing to ‘protect your peace’ because the mental strain and emotional toll a bad friendship or a toxic relationship can have on you is never worth it. Sometimes, you have to distance yourself from someone not to punish them, but because continuing the relationship is no longer healthy for you. Perhaps you can forgive them and go back to the way things were, but you must also be willing to move on and not indulge them further with your valuable time or presence. Protecting your peace isn’t about expecting every relationship to be easy; it’s about recognizing when maintaining a relationship has become more harmful than healthy.

As we get older, part of growing up is realizing that not every relationship or friendship is meant to last forever. Some people are meant to accompany us for a season, teach us something, share an experience with us, and eventually move on. There doesn’t have to be hatred or resentment involved on either side. Sometimes the healthiest thing you can do for yourself and ultimately for them is simply stop indulging in a relationship that no longer brings out the best in either of you.

Raise Hail! (Washington Commanders Game at Northwest Stadium)

“My first Washington Commanders game live since 2011 as they take on the Tennessee Titans at home in Landover, Maryland at Northwest Stadium led by Quarterback Jayden Daniels.”

Camera: iPhone 15

Locations: Northwest Stadium; Landover, Maryland, United States

The Hidden Harm of Toxic Positivity

“Toxic positivity often comes from a good place whether it’s a desire to encourage, comfort, or inspire. Yet, when optimism becomes an expectation rather than a choice, it can silence genuine emotions and leave people feeling isolated during life’s most difficult moments, personally or professionally.”

It’s good to stay positive in both professional and personal contexts, especially as being negative or pessimistic can be very isolating in American culture. I think of myself as a forward-looking person who likes to think things will eventually work out in the end and if not, at least you did your best to swing the outcome favorably. Being positive and ‘toxic positivity’ is very different though as there’s a clear difference between being positive all the time (toxic positivity) and being positive yet realistic. When you’re positive all the time and want others to do the same, you really gloss over the negatives of any situation and when real fixes need to be applied rather than brushed over.

When you’re hoping for a positive outcome, you need to understand clearly what the issue is, how to resolve it, and how to keep a realistic perspective on why that problem exists. Toxic positivity means never needing to acknowledge the problem at hand and can be easily compared to the ‘elephant in the room.’ Not only can this lead to individual issues but it can also affect larger organizations and institutions as a result.

Institutionally, it’s good to be optimistic and want everyone to be positive on how things are going, but if you’re constantly only thinking about what’s good and ignoring what’s bad or what could be improved and also not listening to the individuals pointing out the issues that could be fixed, the institution, whatever sector you’re in, will decline as a result. An after-effect of not acknowledging problems or even being allowed to voice them is that the ill effects of this attitude can spread where people end up being gaslit, silenced, or even isolated entirely causing the trust in the institution’s capacity to solve actual problems to suffer as a result.

Whether at an individual or larger level, you should be able to acknowledge the good and bad in every situation and be comfortable sharing it personally or professionally. It’s important to make sure you’re not too heavy in the positivity or the negativity but both sides must be shared for things to progress. If you’re constantly positive and not thinking about what could be improved or taken care of, nothing will change and small issues could become big ones if not addressed. The same goes for if you’re constantly negative and nitpicking every little thing, you won’t be able to foster cooperation or problem solving and end up hurting your reputation or your ability to deal with challenges or that of your organization in the future.

Being honest with yourself about what needs to change, am I responsible for what needs to be done, and how to think about the good and bad of any situation is key to being a full-fledged adult and having real introspection. The same can be said for any organization or institution looking to improve itself. If you are silencing dissent, aren’t transparent at all, and never solicit feedback from within the professional body you are apart of, things will end up much more negative as a result and problems will never get solved and likely lead to larger issues.

I’ve always thought that there is never going to be a perfect situation, result, or outcome individually or institutionally and that it’s important to acknowledge the positives while being clear about the negatives too. Sometimes, nothing can be done about a negative situation but it’s important to at least acknowledge that it exists instead of pretending that it doesn’t exist at all.

Personally, think of your own accountability in how you handle everyday situations when maybe you don’t do as well as on a test even though you passed it, you still could have done better and studied more. Yes, you may have gone to the gym once or twice a week and that’s a nice habit but perhaps you can do more still to improve your physical fitness. Professionally, is there a ‘lessons learned’ that you glean from a project or presentation on what went well and what could be improved for next time? Are you able to give feedback about your organization without worrying about what they’ll think of you, or will there be isolation because of expressing your views?

Toxic positivity often comes from a good place whether it’s a desire to encourage, comfort, or inspire. Yet, when optimism becomes an expectation rather than a choice, it can silence genuine emotions and leave people feeling isolated during life’s most difficult moments, personally or professionally. True positivity is not pretending that everything is fine all the time; it is having the courage to face reality while believing that better days are still possible.

By creating space for honesty, empathy, and authentic conversations, we build stronger relationships and healthier communities where people feel seen, heard, and supported. Sometimes the most powerful response isn’t offering a silver lining at all. It’s simply saying, “I’m here with you,” or “I understand where you’re coming from,” and giving someone the freedom to express both the highs and lows that make us human. After all, genuine compassion isn’t about replacing difficult emotions with positive ones, it’s about making sure no one has to face them alone.